Customer center login
Country and Language

Roland Aerophone AE-10 G

28

Digital wind instrument

  • With saxophone grip and internal sound generation
  • Many sounds
  • Fingering as with acoustic saxophones
  • Mouthpiece with reed and bleed sensor for a familiar as well as differentiated game and the ability to control vibrato and pitch
  • Roland's SuperNATURAL technology reproduces the finest nuances of sound, enabling a dynamic and articulated game
  • Authentic saxophone sound colors such as soprano, alto, tenor and baritone, which can be easily changed at any time
  • Other acoustic sounds such as wind instruments (clarinet, flute and trumpet) and violin
  • Contains Roland's latest synthesizer sounds, optimized for use in a wind instrument
  • Intuitive operation thanks to sound selection and setting changes via a display
  • Flexible use thanks to internal loudspeakers
  • Battery supply (6x AA) with a running time of 7 hours in continuous use with headphone operation
  • USB port for connecting to a computer
  • Audio input for connecting a smartphone or music player to play accompaniment songs
  • Colour: Graphite grey
  • Including power supply
  • Matching stand available under art.

    404693

    (not included)
Item number 421871
811 €
All prices incl. VAT
Available immediately
Available immediately

This item is in stock and can be dispatched immediately.

Standard Delivery Times
Delivery free of charge expected between Monday, 1.11. and Tuesday, 2.11.
1
7 Sales Rank

28 Customer Reviews

5 19 Customers
4 6 Customers
3 2 Customers
2 0 Customers
1 1 Customer
4.5 / 5

handling

features

sound

quality

MR
An excellent instrument for near silent practise
Matthew R 11.12.2017
I bought an Aerophone to use for practising when it would be antisocial to use my Alto or Tenor Sax. I expect to use it extensively when I'm on trips away in my motorhome but after only 3 days I have already found it useful when practising late in the evening at home, where the alternatives are "don't practise", or irate neighbours and potential divorce.

My early impressions are that the Aerophone can be set up to provide a useful practise instrument. Playing the Aerophone is not the same as playing a saxophone with a vibrating reed and column of air to control and manipulate. I'm experimenting with the breath and bite controls to see what can be achieved and, while it is not a saxophone, even out of the box its close enough for my purposes.

The only real negative so far is that the sound quality from the instrument itself is less than wonderful (classic British understatement), but when played through a decent set of headphones or a separate speaker the sound quality is vastly improved, to the point of being enjoyable and beyond.

I've only had the Aerophone for 3 days and so far have only scraped the surface of what it can do beyond being like a sax but I can see that there are plenty of features to explore that will keep me experimenting for some time to come.

Summary:
Pro - It is a useful practise intstrument for when playing a Saxophone is impractical.

Con - The standalone sound quality from the intstrument is tolerable but its not wonderful. The sound is vastly improved by use of heaphones or an external speaker.
handling
features
sound
quality
10
0
Report

Report

a
Awesome instrument, really happy with it
alohahawaii 28.07.2021
As COVID-19 started with all the limitations, I decided to get back to my hobby from the past - saxophone. My neighbors wouldn't appreciate if I started blowing an acoustic horn, also, I mainly have free time in the evenings, when my family sleeps. That is why I was looking for an instrument, that would be very close to a saxophone, but I could play it in my headphones.

Initially, I wanted to buy Yamaha YDS 150 and spent long months waiting for it. However, the supply kept being postponed in all the EU shops I checked, so I did a research again, and Roland Aerophone AE10 caught my attention. It's funny, because I've read later, that Yamaha wanted to bite off a part of Roland's market, but, ironically, because of their supply problems I made a research again and actually bought a product of Yamaha’s competitor.

DISCLAIMER: I haven't played acoustic sax for ~9 years, so if I compare an Aerophone to a sax, you should read it as: comparison of an Aerophone to how I remember playing sax 9 years ago. Also, my sax is in a different country now, so I don’t have a possibility to compare.

The instrument is awesome. I really enjoy playing it.

Keys:
The keys are quite comfortable and I felt it even comfier than my sax as I remember it. I was surprised, how the futuristic-looking keys would feel so good. The only thing I don't like is the small Bb key of the 1st octave, it's quite far from the B, which makes it tricky to press both B and Bb with one finger.
I’ve seen in reviews people were complaining, that there is no rollers in the low not keys (e.g. G#, C#, B, Bb), but I didn’t have any issue with that. Because of the angled shape, it’s pretty comfy to move finger from one key to another.
You can set sensitivity of the keys, which essentially means the delay (or discrete interval) to let you change the keys for a different note. To give you an idea: if you set it to 0, and your fingers are not well synchronized to press all the keys simultaneously, you may catch some overtone fingering in between the notes. I set sensitivity to 0 to practice better, how I press the keys. Also, I like to play (or want to play :) ) fast things, like bebop, and although, I’m not sure if it really makes difference, I decided to eliminate any delay.

Right hand thumb lever - I disabled it, as I don't like the random effects, if I touch it with my thumb unintentionally.

Mouthpiece, bite sensor, breath sensor:
I was surprised how it felt similar to sax, at least how I remember it. I used to play 3.5-4 reeds with quite a big mouthpiece opening, so I was looking for a similar feel.
Breath sensor - you can change in the settings different strength of breath. So, if you are looking for that sax resistance in the feel - you can get it. In opposite, you can set it to the lowest, if you don’t care about similarity with sax feel. I configured it to H1 (on the scale L3-L1 M H1-H3, where L is low resistance, and H is high).
Mouthpiece and bite sensor. First day I spent several hours playing with them. I felt like I’m missing intonation, and had really hard time, as the pitch of a note would be constantly changing and react on a very small lip tension change. Later, when I washed mouthpiece and put it back, I understood, that it might be because the mouthpiece was not positioned well, and I didn’t readjust after removing the instrument from the box. So pay attention, how it’s set. After I put it right, it was absolutely different experience. You can set bite sensor sensitivity or even turn it off. I really enjoy how it works, as by feel it’s really similar to how acoustic mouthpiece works.
The mouthpiece is plastic and very easy to scratch, I played for 2 min and already leaved my teeth marks. So make sure to buy sax mouthpiece cushions together with your instrument. I don’t know, why Roland didn’t include at least one.

Sound:
First of all, I haven’t experimented with the sound, as I was buying a practice instrument to replace sax, so I just stick to alto-sax sound, and play it. The built in speakers are horrible, so you need to either buy a separate speaker, or you can play in your headphones (that is what I do). If you plan to play in your headphones, you need the 6.3 mm to 3.5mm jack adapter. The sound library is great, I enjoy the sound quality. I like how smartly it’s made, for example, like in a real sax, the timber would change dependently on how hard you blow into it.
It has 3.5mm in port, where you can connect your metronome or play-along from a phone or computer, so the sound from that source will be combined with your playing in the speaker/headphones.
I haven’t experimented with the midi-port and haven’t created/modified custom sounds, I just stick to what is already there. Though, I know, this option exists with an external equipments/software, and then you can save it on the Aerophone.

Hygiene:
The mouthpiece is removable, and you can wash it. However, it’s still a big question for me, what’s going to happen in the long run with the instrument. It has a long pipe going through the instrument from the mouthpiece to the very end, where it has a small hole from where condensate is dripping. Cleaning and wiping my sax regularly, I feel uncomfortable, that I can’t access this pipe to clean it. I couldn’t find any information in the internet, how to clean it from inside. So might be, it can start stinking in longer run.

Conclusion:
Really good instrument, in my opinion, can be used both as a practice and a gig instrument. Talking about practice: you still have to have your embouchure trained on an acoustic instrument. Aerophone is not good to train it. However, if you are looking for a tool to exercise scales, arpeggios, leaks, in other words, key technique, it’s great. It’s also a lot of fun trying different sounds. I have a lot of fun, playing it, and after watching more reviews and comparisons in the Internet, I’m happy, that I bought Roland Aerophone instead of Yamaha YDS 150.
handling
features
sound
quality
1
0
Report

Report

google translate de
Unfortunately there was an error. Please try again later.
s
v.a. für Saxophonisten
saxwood 22.10.2019
Ich bin Saxophonist und wollte schon seit längerem einen Wind-Controller probieren. Eins vorweg: ich bin ein riesiger Michael Brecker-Fan und habe nach einer Möglichkeit zur Erzeugung von Synth-Klängen gesucht.

Vergangenen Monat war es dann soweit und ich bestellte mir einmal das Roland Aerophone AE-10 und einmal das Akai EWI 5000.

Aerophone:
Ich war eigentlich überrascht, wie leicht das Aerophone ist. Gut zum Halten, aber insgesamt wirkte es dann doch eher wie ein Spielzeug auf mich. Sehr viel Plastik, bei dem ich mir nicht sicher bin, wie robust das Teil dann wirklich ist. Für mich aber wichtig, da ich es auch live einsetzen möchte.

Als Saxophonist gewöhnt man sich aber durch das "Blatt" und der starken Anlehnung ans Saxophonist sehr schnell an die Spielweise mit dem Aerophone - beim EWI musste ich da schon etwas mehr üben. Der integrierte Lautsprecher ist aber eher nur zum Üben gut, der Sound haute mich nicht um. Da spielte ich dann doch lieber über meine Studio-Monitore.
Die Sounds waren im großen und ganzen ok. Synthetische Klänge waren dann doch nicht so viele drauf, da hätte ich mehr erwartet. Dafür sehr viele Samples realer Instrumente. Digitale Saxophon-Sounds finde ich jedoch oft sehr furchtbar, leider konnten auch die des Aerophone nicht völlig überzeugen. Positiv überrascht war ich jedoch vom Bass-Sound.
Die Funktionen des Joy-Sticks mit dem rechten Daumen waren zwar nett, aber etwas ungeschickt in der Bedienung.

Ich habe mich dann doch für den EWI entschieden. Grund waren zusammengefasst
- mehr synthetische Sounds
- Verarbeitung wirkte fertiger
- meiner Meinung nach mehr Möglichkeiten

Saxophonisten, die jedoch keinen zu großen Unterschied zum akustischen Instrument möchten oder eher nach einem Instrument mit Sounds von realen Instrumenten suchen empfehle ich jedoch eher zum Aerophone als zum EWI zu greifen.
handling
features
sound
quality
7
0
Report

Report

google translate fr
Unfortunately there was an error. Please try again later.
pb
piano blues 31.10.2020
je suis saxophoniste amateur et j'avais acheté cet aérophone , pensant qu' il pourrait jouer le rôle de practice ; mais ce n'est pas un saxophone . pas la même ergonomie ,pas le même son, pas les mêmes sensations que sur un sax . donc le l'ai revendu car ne correspondant pas à mes attentes . Par contre c'est un contrôleur midi excellent .et très complet rien à repprocher à Roland bien au contraire !
handling
features
sound
quality
1
0
Report

Report

YouTube on this topic

Need help?